|
Post by kingsxman on Aug 30, 2022 6:55:51 GMT -6
Where were his hits? I know you love fatally flawed players, but he didn't unearth anyone in the draft, and all his FAs were failed players that weren't any better here. Adelman and Andrei Kirilenko were probably his biggest/best moves - and how hard is it to "discover" those guys? He was a guy who would pick up discarded, scratched-off lottery tickets and think if he scratched them a little harder, there would be a hidden prize underneath. We had a ceiling of total mediocrity with Kahn. Mostly because he was never a basketball guy. As much as I am not a Kahn fan, i have to give him credit for those 2 moves. He DID make them regardless of how hard it was to "disover" them. He had put together a pretty damn good team when he had that team with Adelman coaching. Kahns biggest issue is that he always thought he was the smartest person in the room. He took the job and didnt listen to anyone. By the end it appeared he was "maybe" getting it and starting to listen to a few people...but it was too late. He was in the wrong position. He should have been an assistant GM first doing cap stuff and contracts. I think he actually may have done well with that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2022 8:20:54 GMT -6
And I did like he took fliers on a lot of dudes, swapping Sessions, Hollins, Webster, with guys like Koufos, Ridnour, Barea, and Budinger.
The tools to do that were different but it’s the same idea as this non NBA two way contracts. I believe then it was more common to pluck guys in G league and potentially sign to multiple ten days or possibly the remainder of the season.
The way Rubio’s draft was covered, specifically that he was never coming, and it made no sense to take a point guard that could step in right a way given the wait for Rubio, in what was expected to be a bad draft beyond the PG position was alway bunk because that’s a perfectly reasonable strategy.
Being outside the league’s club of bro’s did not help, but had they received coverage more like oh, it’s kind of a weird interesting thing Minnesota’s doing, or just been ignored it would have been allowed to grow more organically.
|
|
|
Post by levine on Aug 30, 2022 9:15:54 GMT -6
Where were his hits? I know you love fatally flawed players, but he didn't unearth anyone in the draft, and all his FAs were failed players that weren't any better here. Adelman and Andrei Kirilenko were probably his biggest/best moves - and how hard is it to "discover" those guys? He was a guy who would pick up discarded, scratched-off lottery tickets and think if he scratched them a little harder, there would be a hidden prize underneath. We had a ceiling of total mediocrity with Kahn. Mostly because he was never a basketball guy. They were a stud wing away from being really good, but they were f’d because everyone thought Love was up there with Durant and LeBron. To me the lesson is more about you need more than three years, and you need everyone on board (including fans, and NBA narrative creators). Need to be lucky health wise, and most importantly have to hope your period of tanking coincides with one of those franchise movers. I’d say he hit on all of those guys as quality starters and rotation players. Took some great low risk fliers on premium talent, and if they’re healthy that third and forth season they’re in the mix. Now does that mean championship? I mean there you’re talking you almost got have a top five player unless your GS. 11-12 was the year to spend around rookie Rubio, like Wolves are doing with Edwards right now. I don’t know if Gay would have considered coming here, but I think Batum had genuine interest. Otherwise if you keep Love ideally you find a defensive minded wing or center next to Pek. Starting or being in the rotation of a bad team does not make one a "quality starters or rotation players". Batum was another interesting failure by Kahn. Wasted all that time chasing an RFA that we had no chance at getting - and even made an illegal initial offer to him.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2022 11:47:21 GMT -6
Wes, Ellington were ten year players. Flynn likely would have been.
If your defining hit no DK did not draft Edwards or KD.
Batum was a solid target if we had to keep Love, and while I think he saw appeal to pair with Love and Rubio he preferred to stay as many players do after that rookie contract. If nothing else maybe helps Batum get more out of Portland.
It was not illegal, unless it’s like a Portland blog that said it made us feel bad he had another offer. I’ve been watching a lot of that Portlandia doc lately so I assume it’s accurate. Any other gm making a play for Batum is considered a smart, savy move, even if it’s unlikely he leaves, especially to a rival, and he backs that up with Kirilenko. I mean, that is air tight gm-ing.
|
|
|
Post by levine on Aug 30, 2022 11:54:00 GMT -6
Wes, Ellington were ten year players. Flynn likely would have been. If your defining hit no DK did not draft Edwards or KD. Batum was a solid target if we had to keep Love, and while I think he saw appeal to pair with Love and Rubio he preferred to stay as many players do after that rookie contract. If nothing else maybe helps Batum get more out of Portland. It was not illegal, unless it’s like a Portland blog that said it made us feel bad he had another offer. I’ve been watching a lot of that Portlandia doc lately so I assume it’s accurate. Any other gm making a play for Batum is considered a smart, savy move, even if it’s unlikely he leaves, especially to a rival, and he backs that up with Kirilenko. I mean, that is air tight gm-ing. If you're going to die on a hill for a guy who could draft/sign guys who could be 7th-10th men on a roster for a decade, I don't know what else to say. The Batum offer was illegal because we didn't have the cap space to make the initial offer we did.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2022 12:11:29 GMT -6
Wes, Ellington were ten year players. Flynn likely would have been. If your defining hit no DK did not draft Edwards or KD. Batum was a solid target if we had to keep Love, and while I think he saw appeal to pair with Love and Rubio he preferred to stay as many players do after that rookie contract. If nothing else maybe helps Batum get more out of Portland. It was not illegal, unless it’s like a Portland blog that said it made us feel bad he had another offer. I’ve been watching a lot of that Portlandia doc lately so I assume it’s accurate. Any other gm making a play for Batum is considered a smart, savy move, even if it’s unlikely he leaves, especially to a rival, and he backs that up with Kirilenko. I mean, that is air tight gm-ing. If you're going to die on a hill for a guy who could draft/sign guys who could be 7th-10th men on a roster for a decade, I don't know what else to say. The Batum offer was illegal because we didn't have the cap space to make the initial offer we did. I def don't love everything Kahn did, and there's a lot I learned about team building during this era. I don't love they never built the team with Rubio in mind meaning center, and stud perimeter scorer oppose to anchoring everything around a stretch four. He was under the gun in a way that made no sense. It is because Woj and Simmons convinced Love and fans they had no plan despite Presti just doing this 07' to 09' and it was barely covered other than the occasional what a genius article. Presti is the one that dubbed it the process, Hinkie took it from that. It was not new. Because guys like Rosas, Hinkie were approved by the NBA intellectual dark web, Wolves fans assumed they were good. The reality is the difference is who was there, when they drafted, and in Rosas case he had a decade of the Built to Lose era to get Towns on board, and did not have media telling Wolves we were all dummies for tanking to get Ball, or Ant. Obviously it was a new era of team building, and while I didn't really know how it would be the new norm, I thought it was very interesting, and practical team building. Fans have it so wrong because of the outsized influence of two early internet trolls.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2022 12:13:37 GMT -6
I mean if Love was on a team they liked, or say Morey or Marks you can guarantee the conversation around Love would be he's not a five year max guy.
A rule that was changed just years after so teams can have two, five year designated max guys.
Love was a third or forth guy who believed he was LeBron, and in his defense it's mostly what those guys were saying at the time.
|
|
|
Post by BIG BAD WOLF on Sept 8, 2022 7:48:00 GMT -6
Up to Towns, this team never had a #1 overall pick. The best they had was a #2 they used on Williams (hailed as the second coming of Stoudemire at the time), a #3 they used on Mayo and traded that same night for #5 Love (skip over Laettner at #3, not worth talking about), and a #5 that eventually turned into MVP KG. Actually #5 was the best chance of building this team had over the years: Rubio, Ray Allen, JR Rider join the two Kevins as the #5 picks. Of course they traded for #1s with the one that has a worse drafting record than theirs: they took Bennett and Wiggins from CLE! All that being said, making the playoffs for as many years as they did in a Western conference featuring the Malone/Stockton UTA, Duncan/Robinson SAS, Kobe/Shaq LAL and a scary litany of other good teams with much better opportunities (SAC, DAL, HOU, SEA, POR) is to be regarded as a big achievement under the circumstances. As far as Kahn goes, I would argue that MIN would have been better off keeping McHale over that period of time. The best player Kahn had (Love) was drafted by McHale! All Kahn (and his hired coach, Rambis) did was to antagonize him o the point where he asked to be traded. And Kahn had much better drafting opportunities than McHale ever did. Seriously, Kahn's name should never be used in association with the NBA GM notion!
|
|
|
Post by kingsxman on Sept 8, 2022 9:09:34 GMT -6
Up to Towns, this team never had a #1 overall pick. The best they had was a #2 they used on Williams (hailed as the second coming of Stoudemire at the time), a #3 they used on Mayo and traded that same night for #5 Love (skip over Laettner at #3, not worth talking about), and a #5 that eventually turned into MVP KG. Actually #5 was the best chance of building this team had over the years: Rubio, Ray Allen, JR Rider join the two Kevins as the #5 picks. Of course they traded for #1s with the one that has a worse drafting record than theirs: they took Bennett and Wiggins from CLE! All that being said, making the playoffs for as many years as they did in a Western conference featuring the Malone/Stockton UTA, Duncan/Robinson SAS, Kobe/Shaq LAL and a scary litany of other good teams with much better opportunities (SAC, DAL, HOU, SEA, POR) is to be regarded as a big achievement under the circumstances. As far as Kahn goes, I would argue that MIN would have been better off keeping McHale over that period of time. The best player Kahn had (Love) was drafted by McHale! All Kahn (and his hired coach, Rambis) did was to antagonize him o the point where he asked to be traded. And Kahn had much better drafting opportunities than McHale ever did. Seriously, Kahn's name should never be used in association with the NBA GM notion! Agreed on last bolded part. You bring up an interesting point: would we have been better off with McHale than Kahn over the 3 years (or was it 4?) that we had Kahn? I think we probably would have....but McHale's weakness would have been put on display again. His 2 biggest weaknesses, IMHO, were that he didnt want to work hard (relied on the eye test and NCAA tourney play) and that he could NOT judge guard talent to save his life. He made one good guard pick in his tenor: Stephon Marbury. Otherwise, he missed badly on any chance to get good guard play to the team. One of the single biggest "misses" we had was the "Foye over Roy" debacle. They didnt want Roy because of his knees. Turns out they were kind of right in that Roy got a number of good years before it became an issue, but it did become an issue. However, had we drafted him instead of Foye, we would have put an all star scoring guard right along side Kevin Garnett. I would venture to say that had we done this...KG would have retired a wolf and never left. The reason I say this ties in with my first bolded sentence above: KG's talent and drive was enough to get bad teams into the playoffs. Add Roy....we're contenders for at least 3 or 4 years.
|
|
|
Post by jojo on Sept 8, 2022 10:20:24 GMT -6
I agree that Roy could have changed the direction of the franchise. But here’s another one. What if Rosas had not traded Saric to move up in the draft and they picked A good player instead of Culver. Having 2 decent players instead of a bust would have won them more games and probably pushed them out of #1 2020 pick. So they wouldn’t have got Ant! So thank you Gersson for your stupid trade and lack of big men on the roster that year!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2022 10:35:39 GMT -6
No bigs or offense for three years.
I think Wolves fans were drugged, and don’t have any idea what was going on with this era.
We were a CJ Miles away from contending!
Allegedly Grizz offered Rudy Gay for Love sometime around broken hand gate. Nothing firm though. Imagine Gay instead of a catch and shoot stretch four.
Beas was a version of this, but once Adelman arrived he got iced out of being featured at all. I really would have loved to see that 2011-12 roster operated minus Love. Love was the guy we needed to move, but MN whites might have succeeded from the union if that happened.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2022 11:14:12 GMT -6
McHale drafted Craig Smith because “oddities are good in the NBA.”
McHale would have been A LOT different because he would not have opted for the modern reset/tank stuff. Instead would have tried to add pieces to Foye, Love, Miller and McCants.
McHale and whoever was in that room absolutely could not draft anybody.
|
|
|
Post by Nick K on Sept 8, 2022 16:37:10 GMT -6
No bigs or offense for three years. I think Wolves fans were drugged, and don’t have any idea what was going on with this era. We were a CJ Miles away from contending! Allegedly Grizz offered Rudy Gay for Love sometime around broken hand gate. Nothing firm though. Imagine Gay instead of a catch and shoot stretch four. Beas was a version of this, but once Adelman arrived he got iced out of being featured at all. I really would have loved to see that 2011-12 roster operated minus Love. Love was the guy we needed to move, but MN whites might have succeeded from the union if that happened.I think any Wolves fan black or white would have seceded from the union because KL was the best player on the team. Beasley was a load who didn't work very hard and Adelman saw that and moved him.
I'm sure you just forgot that KL averaged 20pts 15rebs 42% from 3. 48% fg% and 85% ft.
The next season he avg'd 26pts and 13 rebs. Remember the outlet passes full court. We've never seen anything like it since.
|
|
|
Post by kingsxman on Sept 9, 2022 8:48:43 GMT -6
No bigs or offense for three years. I think Wolves fans were drugged, and don’t have any idea what was going on with this era. We were a CJ Miles away from contending! Allegedly Grizz offered Rudy Gay for Love sometime around broken hand gate. Nothing firm though. Imagine Gay instead of a catch and shoot stretch four. Beas was a version of this, but once Adelman arrived he got iced out of being featured at all. I really would have loved to see that 2011-12 roster operated minus Love. Love was the guy we needed to move, but MN whites might have succeeded from the union if that happened.I think any Wolves fan black or white would have seceded from the union because KL was the best player on the team. Beasley was a load who didn't work very hard and Adelman saw that and moved him.
I'm sure you just forgot that KL averaged 20pts 15rebs 42% from 3. 48% fg% and 85% ft.
The next season he avg'd 26pts and 13 rebs. Remember the outlet passes full court. We've never seen anything like it since.
Biggest issue with Love is that he was the best player on a bad team....which raised his importance to our team more than it probably should have been. He is/was NOT the best player on a team that did anything in the playoffs. Just another instance of us not being able to surround a good player with "better" players.
|
|
|
Post by tmill720 on Sept 9, 2022 12:00:35 GMT -6
I think any Wolves fan black or white would have seceded from the union because KL was the best player on the team. Beasley was a load who didn't work very hard and Adelman saw that and moved him.
I'm sure you just forgot that KL averaged 20pts 15rebs 42% from 3. 48% fg% and 85% ft.
The next season he avg'd 26pts and 13 rebs. Remember the outlet passes full court. We've never seen anything like it since.
Biggest issue with Love is that he was the best player on a bad team....which raised his importance to our team more than it probably should have been. He is/was NOT the best player on a team that did anything in the playoffs. Just another instance of us not being able to surround a good player with "better" players.Hmm, who's responsible for that? Is that the GM? So.... Kahn?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2022 9:47:05 GMT -6
Biggest issue with Love is that he was the best player on a bad team....which raised his importance to our team more than it probably should have been. He is/was NOT the best player on a team that did anything in the playoffs. Just another instance of us not being able to surround a good player with "better" players.Hmm, who's responsible for that? Is that the GM? So.... Kahn? I understand those media dudes are your heroes, but the truth about that era is this was our built to lose team, and by year three Kahn had assembled a very fun, young, talented roster, with flexibility to add a potential stud wing, which is what he was trying to do. The difference between the gm's you revere, and Kahn is your boys, and the 2010, and 2011 drafts being historically weak at the top of the draft compared to 07, and 08. Truly if Porland took KD, Presti is taking Oden and this is an entirely different history. 2007-08 Seattle drafts KD, they assemble a roster similar to year one of Kahn, tank for Westbrook. In 08-09 they won 23 games. Surprisingly never received any heat for, this tank a third season and landed James Harden. None of which was covered as if they were tanking. The little reporting that happened was a couple articles on ESPN and NY Times about what a great plan this was. So how then does Kahn get covered so drastically differently? It turns out hell hath no furry like a scorned Bristol man. Imagine if instead of Derrick Williams Wolves land the number two pick and are adding soon to be goat Anthony Edwards? This is largely the difference. Adelman's second year is a nightmare, they blow up their entire process to maximize Love, who of course signs his four year max, breaks his hand, lies about breaking his hand, and then follows that up with the Woj interview, either to get ahead of it, and or pave the way for his presumably west coast exit (def seems like Schwartz was one of the guys who had Woj in his pocket). Rubio's coming back from a knee injury, Love played 18 games that year, the rest of the roster is effectively what this past December January was with covid for so many teams, guys in an out all season long. Pek played 62, Rubio 57, Mickael Gelabale started 13 games, Malcolm Lee 12, Greg Stiemsma 19. Chase Budinger who was brought in to replace the oft injured Martell Webster gave us 23 games. This was all due to injuries, oh, and Adelman's wife was in and out of the hospital with seizsures. All of which was just presented as Wolves suck. If you were a Wolves fan at the time, it was clear they weren't going to win given the circumstances, and it shouldn't have been that big of a deal. The problem is national media didn't cover as such. Truly the more I think about it, it's so, so similar to how like Rush Limbaugh fans experience the Obama years. I get why you don't appreciate what was going on, but unless you acknowledge what year one and two were in terms of the built to lose stuff, and the 2012-13 season it's sort of like debating whether or not Clintons are serial murders with a Rush fan. And definite parallels to the rise of talk radio in the late 80's and 90's to the 2010's NBA rumor mill in terms of it's impact on what that team was doing.
|
|
|
Post by tmill720 on Sept 13, 2022 10:54:14 GMT -6
Hmm, who's responsible for that? Is that the GM? So.... Kahn? I understand those media dudes are your heroes, but the truth about that era is this was our built to lose team, and by year three Kahn had assembled a very fun, young, talented roster, with flexibility to add a potential stud wing, which is what he was trying to do. The difference between the gm's you revere, and Kahn is your boys, and the 2010, and 2011 drafts being historically weak at the top of the draft compared to 07, and 08. Truly if Porland took KD, Presti is taking Oden and this is an entirely different history. 2007-08 Seattle drafts KD, they assemble a roster similar to year one of Kahn, tank for Westbrook. In 08-09 they won 23 games. Surprisingly never received any heat for, this tank a third season and landed James Harden. None of which was covered as if they were tanking. The little reporting that happened was a couple articles on ESPN and NY Times about what a great plan this was. So how then does Kahn get covered so drastically differently? It turns out hell hath no furry like a scorned Bristol man. Imagine if instead of Derrick Williams Wolves land the number two pick and are adding soon to be goat Anthony Edwards? This is largely the difference. Adelman's second year is a nightmare, they blow up their entire process to maximize Love, who of course signs his four year max, breaks his hand, lies about breaking his hand, and then follows that up with the Woj interview, either to get ahead of it, and or pave the way for his presumably west coast exit (def seems like Schwartz was one of the guys who had Woj in his pocket). Rubio's coming back from a knee injury, Love played 18 games that year, the rest of the roster is effectively what this past December January was with covid for so many teams, guys in an out all season long. Pek played 62, Rubio 57, Mickael Gelabale started 13 games, Malcolm Lee 12, Greg Stiemsma 19. Chase Budinger who was brought in to replace the oft injured Martell Webster gave us 23 games. This was all due to injuries, oh, and Adelman's wife was in and out of the hospital with seizsures. All of which was just presented as Wolves suck. If you were a Wolves fan at the time, it was clear they weren't going to win given the circumstances, and it shouldn't have been that big of a deal. The problem is national media didn't cover as such. Truly the more I think about it, it's so, so similar to how like Rush Limbaugh fans experience the Obama years. I get why you don't appreciate what was going on, but unless you acknowledge what year one and two were in terms of the built to lose stuff, and the 2012-13 season it's sort of like debating whether or not Clintons are serial murders with a Rush fan. And definite parallels to the rise of talk radio in the late 80's and 90's to the 2010's NBA rumor mill in terms of it's impact on what that team was doing. It's funny how much you absolve Kahn's drafting issues by saying "the media dudes and experts all said it was a good pick at the time!", yet also claim those same people had a vengeance against us. I get that you are saying Kahn would look better if he had lucked into Kyrie instead of Derrick Williams. Or won the Wes Johnson lottery for John Wall. What you're saying about Kahn is at best, he is replacement level. He can do what is expected of him and nothing more. If he gets good luck, the Wolves would be good. If we get bad luck, the Wolves would be bad (as we were). I don't know know why you think I love Presti, Hinkie, or Rosas, as I have always thought that teams need to have some baseline veteran talent to establish a foundation to succeed. Having all of us love Presti, Hinkie, and Rosas fits better into your narrative/conspiracy/fantasy though, so have at it One difference I see between Kahn and those guys though is turning bad luck into further assets. Instead of just keeping Derrick Williams, smart GMs would have either not picked him (despite consensus) or trade him quickly while he still has some value, i.e., pulling a Michael Carter-Williams. Yes, Kahn tried to tear it down and rebuild - he just did a terrible job at it.
|
|
|
Post by levine on Sept 13, 2022 11:09:02 GMT -6
Kahn was in so far over his head, he couldn't tell which way was up.
It's not his fault he was offered a job he was completely and utterly unqualified for.
|
|
|
Post by kingsxman on Sept 13, 2022 11:37:38 GMT -6
Hmm, who's responsible for that? Is that the GM? So.... Kahn? I understand those media dudes are your heroes, but the truth about that era is this was our built to lose team, and by year three Kahn had assembled a very fun, young, talented roster, with flexibility to add a potential stud wing, which is what he was trying to do. The difference between the gm's you revere, and Kahn is your boys, and the 2010, and 2011 drafts being historically weak at the top of the draft compared to 07, and 08. Truly if Porland took KD, Presti is taking Oden and this is an entirely different history. 2007-08 Seattle drafts KD, they assemble a roster similar to year one of Kahn, tank for Westbrook. In 08-09 they won 23 games. Surprisingly never received any heat for, this tank a third season and landed James Harden. None of which was covered as if they were tanking. The little reporting that happened was a couple articles on ESPN and NY Times about what a great plan this was. So how then does Kahn get covered so drastically differently? It turns out hell hath no furry like a scorned Bristol man. Imagine if instead of Derrick Williams Wolves land the number two pick and are adding soon to be goat Anthony Edwards? This is largely the difference. Adelman's second year is a nightmare, they blow up their entire process to maximize Love, who of course signs his four year max, breaks his hand, lies about breaking his hand, and then follows that up with the Woj interview, either to get ahead of it, and or pave the way for his presumably west coast exit (def seems like Schwartz was one of the guys who had Woj in his pocket). Rubio's coming back from a knee injury, Love played 18 games that year, the rest of the roster is effectively what this past December January was with covid for so many teams, guys in an out all season long. Pek played 62, Rubio 57, Mickael Gelabale started 13 games, Malcolm Lee 12, Greg Stiemsma 19. Chase Budinger who was brought in to replace the oft injured Martell Webster gave us 23 games. This was all due to injuries, oh, and Adelman's wife was in and out of the hospital with seizsures. All of which was just presented as Wolves suck. If you were a Wolves fan at the time, it was clear they weren't going to win given the circumstances, and it shouldn't have been that big of a deal. The problem is national media didn't cover as such. Truly the more I think about it, it's so, so similar to how like Rush Limbaugh fans experience the Obama years. I get why you don't appreciate what was going on, but unless you acknowledge what year one and two were in terms of the built to lose stuff, and the 2012-13 season it's sort of like debating whether or not Clintons are serial murders with a Rush fan. And definite parallels to the rise of talk radio in the late 80's and 90's to the 2010's NBA rumor mill in terms of it's impact on what that team was doing. Because he was a pompous ass to most everyone he met? Maybe that had something to do with it. Sometimes i just have a hard time following the "darko stream of consciousness" posts. But I agree with one thing that if we had "lucked" into Kyrie or John Wall Kahn may have lasted longer. But I agree with Tmil70 that good GM's see their mistakes before anyone else does and move them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2022 11:45:19 GMT -6
I understand those media dudes are your heroes, but the truth about that era is this was our built to lose team, and by year three Kahn had assembled a very fun, young, talented roster, with flexibility to add a potential stud wing, which is what he was trying to do. The difference between the gm's you revere, and Kahn is your boys, and the 2010, and 2011 drafts being historically weak at the top of the draft compared to 07, and 08. Truly if Porland took KD, Presti is taking Oden and this is an entirely different history. 2007-08 Seattle drafts KD, they assemble a roster similar to year one of Kahn, tank for Westbrook. In 08-09 they won 23 games. Surprisingly never received any heat for, this tank a third season and landed James Harden. None of which was covered as if they were tanking. The little reporting that happened was a couple articles on ESPN and NY Times about what a great plan this was. So how then does Kahn get covered so drastically differently? It turns out hell hath no furry like a scorned Bristol man. Imagine if instead of Derrick Williams Wolves land the number two pick and are adding soon to be goat Anthony Edwards? This is largely the difference. Adelman's second year is a nightmare, they blow up their entire process to maximize Love, who of course signs his four year max, breaks his hand, lies about breaking his hand, and then follows that up with the Woj interview, either to get ahead of it, and or pave the way for his presumably west coast exit (def seems like Schwartz was one of the guys who had Woj in his pocket). Rubio's coming back from a knee injury, Love played 18 games that year, the rest of the roster is effectively what this past December January was with covid for so many teams, guys in an out all season long. Pek played 62, Rubio 57, Mickael Gelabale started 13 games, Malcolm Lee 12, Greg Stiemsma 19. Chase Budinger who was brought in to replace the oft injured Martell Webster gave us 23 games. This was all due to injuries, oh, and Adelman's wife was in and out of the hospital with seizsures. All of which was just presented as Wolves suck. If you were a Wolves fan at the time, it was clear they weren't going to win given the circumstances, and it shouldn't have been that big of a deal. The problem is national media didn't cover as such. Truly the more I think about it, it's so, so similar to how like Rush Limbaugh fans experience the Obama years. I get why you don't appreciate what was going on, but unless you acknowledge what year one and two were in terms of the built to lose stuff, and the 2012-13 season it's sort of like debating whether or not Clintons are serial murders with a Rush fan. And definite parallels to the rise of talk radio in the late 80's and 90's to the 2010's NBA rumor mill in terms of it's impact on what that team was doing. It's funny how much you absolve Kahn's drafting issues by saying "the media dudes and experts all said it was a good pick at the time!", yet also claim those same people had a vengeance against us. I get that you are saying Kahn would look better if he had lucked into Kyrie instead of Derrick Williams. Or won the Wes Johnson lottery for John Wall. What you're saying about Kahn is at best, he is replacement level. He can do what is expected of him and nothing more. If he gets good luck, the Wolves would be good. If we get bad luck, the Wolves would be bad (as we were). I don't know know why you think I love Presti, Hinkie, or Rosas, as I have always thought that teams need to have some baseline veteran talent to establish a foundation to succeed. Having all of us love Presti, Hinkie, and Rosas fits better into your narrative/conspiracy/fantasy though, so have at it One difference I see between Kahn and those guys though is turning bad luck into further assets. Instead of just keeping Derrick Williams, smart GMs would have either not picked him (despite consensus) or trade him quickly while he still has some value, i.e., pulling a Michael Carter-Williams. Yes, Kahn tried to tear it down and rebuild - he just did a terrible job at it. I don't know where those guys in particular would have had them, but my point is they were mostly in line with the consensus in terms of around where they were drafted. Flynn (had he stayed healthy), Ellington, and Johnson were all very reasonable, even if they would have preferred Harden or Favors respectively. The Williams thing is a bummer, but the only trade seemed to have any real traction was Suns for Gortat, who in hindsight with Pek's injuries would have been great, and far and away Rubio's best screening big here. The Carter Williams trade amounted to nothing. The amazing thing about Hinkie is several of the dudes he drafted couldn't play for two years no one seemed to care. Saric was sold as an asset, oppose to how Bjelica, let alone Rubio was covered.. The reason why he was given more runway is because Woj, Lowe, and Morey gave him the hype to do it. Same reason fans here thought Prosas was finally doing it right. It's a miracle that Embiid has been relatively healthy over that time, but it was really down to Wiggins or Embiid that year. Hinkie didn't have some advanced form of drafting that Kahn didn't, it was simply where the draft fell. Same with Noel, Okafor, and Carter-Williams. Kahn clearly had no issues parting with guys he drafted, or signed, it's the same thing all these other teams were doing, but without the benefit of favorable press, and being such an extreme new form of team building way ahead of where Minnesota fans were at the time. I personally do not like the tanking asset collecting era, but that's because I want to watch basketball games where both teams are attempting to win. I think it was bad for the sport overall and it seems like the league is at least aware of it, if not full on addressing it today, but things like that season cup, and the play-in, are all gimmicks to hopefully eliminate some of the tanking and load management that's just part of the league now. None of which would be better than shortening the regular season.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2022 11:58:51 GMT -6
Philly fans missed out on what probably would have been an all-time favorite in Holiday, and a fun team with Thad Young, Nikola Vucevic, Evan Turner, Lou Williams, Spencer Hawes. A team that with a healthy Andrew Bynum gave Celtics a real run in the playoffs.
It's a different league now, literally every team is mostly building the same style, but all that losing gave him a shot at Embiid, which Hinkie did not survive to see through, because you can't also sell basketball tickets to games like that for multiple seasons even if you found guys like TJ McConnell, and Kendall Marshall. What a mastermind.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2022 11:59:47 GMT -6
I understand those media dudes are your heroes, but the truth about that era is this was our built to lose team, and by year three Kahn had assembled a very fun, young, talented roster, with flexibility to add a potential stud wing, which is what he was trying to do. The difference between the gm's you revere, and Kahn is your boys, and the 2010, and 2011 drafts being historically weak at the top of the draft compared to 07, and 08. Truly if Porland took KD, Presti is taking Oden and this is an entirely different history. 2007-08 Seattle drafts KD, they assemble a roster similar to year one of Kahn, tank for Westbrook. In 08-09 they won 23 games. Surprisingly never received any heat for, this tank a third season and landed James Harden. None of which was covered as if they were tanking. The little reporting that happened was a couple articles on ESPN and NY Times about what a great plan this was. So how then does Kahn get covered so drastically differently? It turns out hell hath no furry like a scorned Bristol man. Imagine if instead of Derrick Williams Wolves land the number two pick and are adding soon to be goat Anthony Edwards? This is largely the difference. Adelman's second year is a nightmare, they blow up their entire process to maximize Love, who of course signs his four year max, breaks his hand, lies about breaking his hand, and then follows that up with the Woj interview, either to get ahead of it, and or pave the way for his presumably west coast exit (def seems like Schwartz was one of the guys who had Woj in his pocket). Rubio's coming back from a knee injury, Love played 18 games that year, the rest of the roster is effectively what this past December January was with covid for so many teams, guys in an out all season long. Pek played 62, Rubio 57, Mickael Gelabale started 13 games, Malcolm Lee 12, Greg Stiemsma 19. Chase Budinger who was brought in to replace the oft injured Martell Webster gave us 23 games. This was all due to injuries, oh, and Adelman's wife was in and out of the hospital with seizsures. All of which was just presented as Wolves suck. If you were a Wolves fan at the time, it was clear they weren't going to win given the circumstances, and it shouldn't have been that big of a deal. The problem is national media didn't cover as such. Truly the more I think about it, it's so, so similar to how like Rush Limbaugh fans experience the Obama years. I get why you don't appreciate what was going on, but unless you acknowledge what year one and two were in terms of the built to lose stuff, and the 2012-13 season it's sort of like debating whether or not Clintons are serial murders with a Rush fan. And definite parallels to the rise of talk radio in the late 80's and 90's to the 2010's NBA rumor mill in terms of it's impact on what that team was doing. Because he was a pompous ass to most everyone he met? Maybe that had something to do with it. Sometimes i just have a hard time following the "darko stream of consciousness" posts. But I agree with one thing that if we had "lucked" into Kyrie or John Wall Kahn may have lasted longer. But I agree with Tmil70 that good GM's see their mistakes before anyone else does and move them. You mean like Ainge, Rosas, Morey, Hinkie, Woj, Simmons? And we all do.
|
|
|
Post by levine on Sept 13, 2022 12:01:28 GMT -6
Because he was a pompous ass to most everyone he met? Maybe that had something to do with it. Sometimes i just have a hard time following the "darko stream of consciousness" posts. But I agree with one thing that if we had "lucked" into Kyrie or John Wall Kahn may have lasted longer. But I agree with Tmil70 that good GM's see their mistakes before anyone else does and move them. You mean like Ainge, Morey, Hinkie, Woj, Simmons? You have to do something before you can get away with being an ass. Like Popovitch and Belichick can be total dicks because they've earned that right.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2022 12:03:13 GMT -6
Kahn was in so far over his head, he couldn't tell which way was up. Did he think it was down? His only mistake was not moving to Oklahoma during that first year. Or having a global pandemic where fans couldn't pay to watch games in person.
|
|
|
Post by levine on Sept 13, 2022 12:11:00 GMT -6
Kahn was in so far over his head, he couldn't tell which way was up. Did he think it was down? His only mistake was not moving to Oklahoma during that first year. Or having a global pandemic where fans couldn't pay to watch games in person. He was a guy with zero qualifications for the job, and he double-downed on that by not hiring any real basketball guys to help him. I get that he's your spirit animal for team building, but he was really bad at his job.
|
|